Aldinga vs Whites Valley, SA Suburb Comparison

Aldinga for families and value; Whites Valley for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AldingaWhites Valley

Overall score

Aldinga

43.8/100

Whites Valley

31.5/100

Crime rate

Aldinga

106.8 / 1k

Whites Valley

35.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aldinga

75

Whites Valley

1

Population

Aldinga

764

Whites Valley

313

Metric leadAldinga 6Whites Valley 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAldingaWhites Valley
Overall score43.8/10031.5/100
Housing (desirability)49.6/10041.6/100
Crime rate106.8 / 1k35.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools5—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops185
Walkability79.0/1007.5/100
Nearby amenities751
Planning activity2417
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population764313
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Aldinga is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Whites Valley is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Aldinga sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Whites Valley is further out with more breathing room.

Aldinga pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Whites Valley is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Aldinga sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Whites Valley.

Aldinga suits families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Whites Valley is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons