Overall score
Aldinga
43.8/100
Port Willunga
30.1/100
Aldinga for families and value; Port Willunga for retirees and beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aldinga
43.8/100
Port Willunga
30.1/100
Crime rate
Aldinga
106.8 / 1k
Port Willunga
44.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aldinga
75
Port Willunga
38
Population
Aldinga
764
Port Willunga
1,785
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aldinga | Port Willunga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.8/100 | 30.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.6/100 | 50.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 106.8 / 1k | 44.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 14 |
| Walkability | 79.0/100 | 23.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 75 | 38 |
| Planning activity | 24 | 33 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Population | 764 | 1,785 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 3/10 |
Aldinga is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Port Willunga is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Port Willunga leans into coastal living, while Aldinga feels more inland and suburban in character.
Aldinga pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Port Willunga is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and a larger local community. Aldinga generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Port Willunga leans toward more sought-after housing.
Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Aldinga the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors are more likely to prefer Port Willunga.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.