Overall score
Port Willunga
30.2/100
Whites Valley
25.8/100
Port Willunga for beach lifestyle and investment; Whites Valley for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Port Willunga
30.2/100
Whites Valley
25.8/100
Crime rate
Port Willunga
32.5 / 1k
Whites Valley
32.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Port Willunga
37
Whites Valley
0
Population
Port Willunga
1,785
Whites Valley
313
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Port Willunga | Whites Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.2/100 | 25.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.6/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.5 / 1k | 32.4 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 5 |
| Walkability | 23.0/100 | 7.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 29 | 12 |
| Population | 1,785 | 313 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 7/10 |
Port Willunga is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, while Whites Valley is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Where Port Willunga is shaped by the coast, Whites Valley offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Port Willunga pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Whites Valley is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Port Willunga generally means more approachable housing costs, while Whites Valley leans toward more sought-after housing.
People chasing a beach lifestyle and investors may find Port Willunga the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Whites Valley.