Arakoon vs Gladstone, NSW suburb comparison

Arakoon for retirees and families; Gladstone for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArakoonGladstone

Overall score

Arakoon

26.4/100

Gladstone

32.0/100

Crime rate

Arakoon

71.3 / 1k

Gladstone

163.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arakoon

2

Gladstone

17

Population

Arakoon

445

Gladstone

437

Metric leadArakoon 3Gladstone 6across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArakoonGladstone
Overall score26.4/10032.0/100
Housing (desirability)57.7/10074.6/100
Crime rate71.3 / 1k163.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops816
Walkability12.0/10041.0/100
Nearby amenities217
Planning activity41
Population445437
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Arakoon is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, while Gladstone is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Arakoon leans into coastal living, while Gladstone feels more inland and suburban in character.

Arakoon tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a larger local community, while Gladstone stands out for housing affordability and public transport access. Arakoon generally means more sought-after housing, while Gladstone leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Arakoon suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Gladstone is the stronger match for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons