Arakoon vs South West Rocks, NSW suburb comparison

Arakoon for retirees and families; South West Rocks for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArakoonSouth West Rocks

Overall score

Arakoon

26.4/100

South West Rocks

52.2/100

Crime rate

Arakoon

71.3 / 1k

South West Rocks

72.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arakoon

2

South West Rocks

125

Population

Arakoon

445

South West Rocks

5,058

Metric leadArakoon 4South West Rocks 5across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArakoonSouth West Rocks
Overall score26.4/10052.2/100
Housing (desirability)57.7/10049.5/100
Crime rate71.3 / 1k72.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops850
Walkability12.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities2125
Planning activity436
Population4455,058
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Arakoon is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and South West Rocks is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Arakoon leans into coastal living, while South West Rocks feels more inland and suburban in character.

Arakoon tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while South West Rocks stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Arakoon generally means more sought-after housing, while South West Rocks leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle may find Arakoon the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer South West Rocks.

Related comparisons