Arakoon vs Stuarts Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

Arakoon for beach lifestyle and schools; Stuarts Point for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArakoonStuarts Point

Overall score

Arakoon

36.7/100

Stuarts Point

48.2/100

Crime rate

Arakoon

71.3 / 1k

Stuarts Point

75.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arakoon

11

Stuarts Point

44

Population

Arakoon

445

Stuarts Point

766

Metric leadArakoon 3Stuarts Point 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArakoonStuarts Point
Overall score36.7/10048.2/100
Housing (desirability)54.4/10050.2/100
Crime rate71.3 / 1k75.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Public transport stops828
Walkability12.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities1144
Planning activity43
Green cover0.0%5.9%
Population445766
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/101/10

Comparison summary

Arakoon reads as a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Stuarts Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Where Arakoon is shaped by the coast, Stuarts Point offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Arakoon is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Stuarts Point answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Arakoon sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Stuarts Point.

Arakoon suits retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and investors more clearly, whereas Stuarts Point is the stronger match for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons