South West Rocks vs Stuarts Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

South West Rocks for schools; Stuarts Point for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

South West RocksStuarts Point

Overall score

South West Rocks

43.3/100

Stuarts Point

48.2/100

Crime rate

South West Rocks

72.2 / 1k

Stuarts Point

75.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

South West Rocks

128

Stuarts Point

44

Population

South West Rocks

5,058

Stuarts Point

766

Metric leadSouth West Rocks 7Stuarts Point 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySouth West RocksStuarts Point
Overall score43.3/10048.2/100
Housing (desirability)51.2/10050.2/100
Crime rate72.2 / 1k75.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves2—
Public transport stops5028
Walkability94.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities12844
Planning activity423
Green cover0.7%5.9%
Population5,058766
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

South West Rocks is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Stuarts Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

South West Rocks tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, while Stuarts Point stands out for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook. South West Rocks generally means more sought-after housing, while Stuarts Point leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer South West Rocks, while Stuarts Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons