Overall score
Frederickton
28.4/100
Gladstone
32.0/100
Frederickton for investment and value; Gladstone for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Frederickton
28.4/100
Gladstone
32.0/100
Crime rate
Frederickton
164.3 / 1k
Gladstone
163.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Frederickton
11
Gladstone
17
Population
Frederickton
1,452
Gladstone
437
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Frederickton | Gladstone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.4/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 74.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 164.3 / 1k | 163.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 16 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 41.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 11 | 17 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 1 |
| Population | 1,452 | 437 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Frederickton is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Gladstone is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Frederickton tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Gladstone stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Frederickton the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gladstone.