Overall score
Ashby
33.6/100
James Creek
34.5/100
Ashby for investment; James Creek for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ashby
33.6/100
James Creek
34.5/100
Crime rate
Ashby
53.6 / 1k
James Creek
51.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashby
1
James Creek
0
Population
Ashby
316
James Creek
257
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashby | James Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.6/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.4/100 | 82.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.6 / 1k | 51.5 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 2 |
| Walkability | 28.5/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 11 |
| Population | 316 | 257 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Ashby is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and James Creek is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Ashby pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas James Creek is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Investors may find Ashby the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer James Creek.