Overall score
Harwood
38.0/100
James Creek
39.1/100
Harwood for retirees and families; James Creek for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Harwood
38.0/100
James Creek
39.1/100
Crime rate
Harwood
62.7 / 1k
James Creek
51.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Harwood
5
James Creek
1
Population
Harwood
346
James Creek
257
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Harwood | James Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.0/100 | 39.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.8/100 | 51.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 62.7 / 1k | 51.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 2 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 11 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 346 | 257 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Harwood reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; James Creek is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Harwood is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; James Creek answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. On housing, Harwood sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in James Creek.
Harwood suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas James Creek is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.