Overall score
James Creek
39.1/100
Townsend
40.8/100
James Creek vs Townsend, NSW Suburb Comparison
James Creek for schools; Townsend for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
James CreekTownsend
Crime rate
James Creek
51.5 / 1k
Townsend
53.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
James Creek
1
Townsend
9
Population
James Creek
257
Townsend
991
Metric leadJames Creek 3Townsend 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesTownsend
- Best for investmentTownsend
- Best for best schoolsJames Creek
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | James Creek | Townsend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.1/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.6/100 | 74.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 51.5 / 1k | 53.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 16 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 26.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 9 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 13 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 257 | 991 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
James Creek reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Townsend is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, James Creek is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Townsend answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
James Creek suits retirees more clearly, whereas Townsend is the stronger match for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.