Overall score
Gulmarrad
33.7/100
Townsend
40.8/100
Townsend for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gulmarrad
33.7/100
Townsend
40.8/100
Crime rate
Gulmarrad
53.2 / 1k
Townsend
53.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gulmarrad
1
Townsend
9
Population
Gulmarrad
1,950
Townsend
991
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gulmarrad | Townsend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.7/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.4/100 | 74.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.2 / 1k | 53.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 16 |
| Walkability | 18.0/100 | 26.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 9 |
| Planning activity | 45 | 13 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,950 | 991 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Gulmarrad is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Townsend is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Gulmarrad tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Townsend stands out for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.
On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Townsend, while Gulmarrad remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.