Gulmarrad vs Townsend, NSW Suburb Comparison

Townsend for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GulmarradTownsend

Overall score

Gulmarrad

33.7/100

Townsend

40.8/100

Crime rate

Gulmarrad

53.2 / 1k

Townsend

53.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gulmarrad

1

Townsend

9

Population

Gulmarrad

1,950

Townsend

991

Metric leadGulmarrad 3Townsend 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGulmarradTownsend
Overall score33.7/10040.8/100
Housing (desirability)61.4/10074.2/100
Crime rate53.2 / 1k53.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Public transport stops1216
Walkability18.0/10026.0/100
Nearby amenities19
Planning activity4513
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population1,950991
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gulmarrad is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Townsend is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Gulmarrad tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Townsend stands out for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Townsend, while Gulmarrad remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons