Overall score
Gulmarrad
33.7/100
James Creek
39.1/100
Gulmarrad vs James Creek, NSW Suburb Comparison
Gulmarrad for families and investment; James Creek for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GulmarradJames Creek
Crime rate
Gulmarrad
53.2 / 1k
James Creek
51.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gulmarrad
1
James Creek
1
Population
Gulmarrad
1,950
James Creek
257
Metric leadGulmarrad 4James Creek 43 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesGulmarrad
- Best for investmentGulmarrad
- Best for best schoolsJames Creek
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gulmarrad | James Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.7/100 | 39.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.4/100 | 51.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.2 / 1k | 51.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 2 |
| Walkability | 18.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 45 | 11 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,950 | 257 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Gulmarrad is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while James Creek is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Gulmarrad is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability; James Creek answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Gulmarrad the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer James Creek.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.