Gulmarrad vs Maclean, NSW Suburb Comparison

Gulmarrad for value; Maclean for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GulmarradMaclean

Overall score

Gulmarrad

33.7/100

Maclean

42.5/100

Crime rate

Gulmarrad

53.2 / 1k

Maclean

53.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gulmarrad

1

Maclean

36

Population

Gulmarrad

1,950

Maclean

2,778

Metric leadGulmarrad 1Maclean 101 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGulmarradMaclean
Overall score33.7/10042.5/100
Housing (desirability)61.4/10065.1/100
Crime rate53.2 / 1k53.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves—6
Public transport stops1237
Walkability18.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities136
Planning activity4527
Green cover0.0%0.6%
Population1,9502,778
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gulmarrad is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Maclean is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Gulmarrad tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Maclean stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Choose Gulmarrad if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Maclean for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons