Overall score
Gulmarrad
35.4/100
Maclean
49.5/100
Gulmarrad for retirees and investment; Maclean for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gulmarrad
35.4/100
Maclean
49.5/100
Crime rate
Gulmarrad
53.2 / 1k
Maclean
53.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gulmarrad
1
Maclean
31
Population
Gulmarrad
1,950
Maclean
2,778
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gulmarrad | Maclean |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.4/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 82.6/100 | 69.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.2 / 1k | 53.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 37 |
| Walkability | 18.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 31 |
| Planning activity | 40 | 22 |
| Population | 1,950 | 2,778 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Gulmarrad is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Maclean is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Gulmarrad tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Maclean stands out for schools and education options and public transport access. Gulmarrad generally means more sought-after housing, while Maclean leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Gulmarrad if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Maclean for families and households prioritising schools.