Gulmarrad vs Maclean, NSW suburb comparison

Gulmarrad for retirees and investment; Maclean for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GulmarradMaclean

Overall score

Gulmarrad

35.4/100

Maclean

49.5/100

Crime rate

Gulmarrad

53.2 / 1k

Maclean

53.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gulmarrad

1

Maclean

31

Population

Gulmarrad

1,950

Maclean

2,778

Metric leadGulmarrad 2Maclean 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGulmarradMaclean
Overall score35.4/10049.5/100
Housing (desirability)82.6/10069.2/100
Crime rate53.2 / 1k53.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Parks & reserves6
Public transport stops1237
Walkability18.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities131
Planning activity4022
Population1,9502,778
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gulmarrad is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Maclean is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Gulmarrad tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Maclean stands out for schools and education options and public transport access. Gulmarrad generally means more sought-after housing, while Maclean leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Gulmarrad if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Maclean for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons