Harwood vs Maclean, NSW Suburb Comparison

Harwood for families; Maclean for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HarwoodMaclean

Overall score

Harwood

38.0/100

Maclean

42.5/100

Crime rate

Harwood

62.7 / 1k

Maclean

53.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Harwood

5

Maclean

36

Population

Harwood

346

Maclean

2,778

Metric leadHarwood 1Maclean 92 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHarwoodMaclean
Overall score38.0/10042.5/100
Housing (desirability)56.8/10065.1/100
Crime rate62.7 / 1k53.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves—6
Public transport stops2137
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities536
Planning activity427
Green cover0.0%0.6%
Population3462,778
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Harwood is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Maclean is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Harwood tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook, while Maclean stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. On housing, Harwood sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Maclean.

Retirees may find Harwood the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Maclean.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons