Overall score
Austral
39.8/100
Cecil Park
46.3/100
Austral vs Cecil Park, NSW Suburb Comparison
Austral for schools; Cecil Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AustralCecil Park
Crime rate
Austral
51.2 / 1k
Cecil Park
21.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Austral
45
Cecil Park
42
Population
Austral
6,847
Cecil Park
815
Metric leadAustral 5Cecil Park 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesCecil Park
- Best for investmentCecil Park
- Best for best valueCecil Park
- Best for best schoolsAustral
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Austral | Cecil Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.8/100 | 46.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.4/100 | 38.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 51.2 / 1k | 21.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 106 | 28 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 45 | 42 |
| Planning activity | 143 | 4 |
| Green cover | 15.1% | 19.7% |
| Population | 6,847 | 815 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Austral reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Cecil Park is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.
Austral pulls ahead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Cecil Park is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Austral if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward Cecil Park for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.