Cecil Park vs Elizabeth Hills, NSW suburb comparison

Cecil Park for investment; Elizabeth Hills for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cecil ParkElizabeth Hills

Overall score

Cecil Park

43.0/100

Elizabeth Hills

46.9/100

Crime rate

Cecil Park

21.1 / 1k

Elizabeth Hills

21.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cecil Park

31

Elizabeth Hills

43

Population

Cecil Park

815

Elizabeth Hills

3,208

Metric leadCecil Park 1Elizabeth Hills 63 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCecil ParkElizabeth Hills
Overall score43.0/10046.9/100
Housing (desirability)56.7/10056.7/100
Crime rate21.1 / 1k21.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops2820
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities3143
Planning activity21
Population8153,208
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Cecil Park is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Elizabeth Hills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Elizabeth Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Cecil Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Cecil Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Elizabeth Hills stands out for nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook.

Investors and households prioritising schools may find Cecil Park the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Elizabeth Hills.

Related comparisons