Overall score
Cecil Park
43.0/100
Elizabeth Hills
46.9/100
Cecil Park for investment; Elizabeth Hills for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cecil Park
43.0/100
Elizabeth Hills
46.9/100
Crime rate
Cecil Park
21.1 / 1k
Elizabeth Hills
21.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cecil Park
31
Elizabeth Hills
43
Population
Cecil Park
815
Elizabeth Hills
3,208
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cecil Park | Elizabeth Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.0/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.7/100 | 56.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.1 / 1k | 21.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 28 | 20 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 43 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 1 |
| Population | 815 | 3,208 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Cecil Park is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Elizabeth Hills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Elizabeth Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Cecil Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Cecil Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Elizabeth Hills stands out for nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Cecil Park the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Elizabeth Hills.