Cecil Park vs Elizabeth Hills, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cecil Park for schools; Elizabeth Hills for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cecil ParkElizabeth Hills

Overall score

Cecil Park

46.3/100

Elizabeth Hills

46.0/100

Crime rate

Cecil Park

21.1 / 1k

Elizabeth Hills

21.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cecil Park

42

Elizabeth Hills

134

Population

Cecil Park

815

Elizabeth Hills

3,208

Metric leadCecil Park 3Elizabeth Hills 63 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCecil ParkElizabeth Hills
Overall score46.3/10046.0/100
Housing (desirability)38.9/10038.4/100
Crime rate21.1 / 1k21.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops2820
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities42134
Planning activity41
Green cover19.7%33.5%
Population8153,208
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Cecil Park is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, while Elizabeth Hills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Elizabeth Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Cecil Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Cecil Park tends to lead on public transport access, while Elizabeth Hills stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Investors may find Cecil Park the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Elizabeth Hills.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons