Balaklava vs Blyth, SA suburb comparison

Balaklava for schools; Blyth for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BalaklavaBlyth

Overall score

Balaklava

28.3/100

Blyth

35.0/100

Crime rate

Balaklava

43.4 / 1k

Blyth

7.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Balaklava

13

Blyth

0

Population

Balaklava

2,083

Blyth

518

Metric leadBalaklava 4Blyth 5across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBalaklavaBlyth
Overall score28.3/10035.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.7/10060.6/100
Crime rate43.4 / 1k7.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Public transport stops2
Walkability3.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities130
Planning activity194
Population2,083518
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Balaklava reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Blyth is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Balaklava sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Blyth is further into the wider countryside.

On the data, Balaklava is stronger for schools and education options and walkability; Blyth answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Balaklava suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Blyth is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons