Balaklava vs Blyth, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Balaklava | Blyth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.3/100 | 35.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.7/100 | 60.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 45.6 / 1k | 7.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 4 |
| Population | 2,083 | 518 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 3/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Balaklava reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Blyth is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Balaklava sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Blyth is further into the wider countryside.
On the data, Balaklava is stronger for schools and education options and walkability; Blyth answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Balaklava suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Blyth is the stronger match for retirees and families.