Balaklava vs Port Wakefield, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Balaklava | Port Wakefield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.3/100 | 21.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.7/100 | 39.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 45.6 / 1k | 187.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 12 |
| Population | 2,083 | 661 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBalaklava
- Best for beach lifestylePort Wakefield
- Best for investmentBalaklava
- Best for best valueBalaklava
- Best for best schoolsBalaklava
Comparison summary
Balaklava is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Port Wakefield is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Port Wakefield is shaped by the coast, Balaklava offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
On the data, Balaklava is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Port Wakefield answers with a calmer planning outlook.
Balaklava suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Port Wakefield is the stronger match for people chasing a beach lifestyle.