Overall score
Balaklava
38.1/100
Port Wakefield
21.3/100
Balaklava for retirees and families; Port Wakefield for beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Balaklava
38.1/100
Port Wakefield
21.3/100
Crime rate
Balaklava
21.9 / 1k
Port Wakefield
220.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Balaklava
14
Port Wakefield
17
Population
Balaklava
2,083
Port Wakefield
661
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Balaklava | Port Wakefield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.1/100 | 21.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.4/100 | 56.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.9 / 1k | 220.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 15.5/100 | 15.5/100 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 14 | 17 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 15 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Population | 2,083 | 661 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Balaklava is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Port Wakefield is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Port Wakefield is shaped by the coast, Balaklava offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
On the data, Balaklava is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Port Wakefield answers with nearby cafés and amenities, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook.
Balaklava suits retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Port Wakefield is the stronger match for people chasing a beach lifestyle.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.