Overall score
Balaklava
38.1/100
Hamley Bridge
36.7/100
Balaklava for investment and value; Hamley Bridge for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Balaklava
38.1/100
Hamley Bridge
36.7/100
Crime rate
Balaklava
21.9 / 1k
Hamley Bridge
21.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Balaklava
14
Hamley Bridge
3
Population
Balaklava
2,083
Hamley Bridge
709
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Balaklava | Hamley Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.1/100 | 36.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.4/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.9 / 1k | 21.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 15.5/100 | 28.8/100 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 14 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 14 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Population | 2,083 | 709 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Balaklava reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Hamley Bridge is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Hamley Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Balaklava keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Balaklava tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability, while Hamley Bridge stands out for a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and overall desirability.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Balaklava, while Hamley Bridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.