Overall score
Bald Hills
62.4/100
Brighton
75.0/100
Brighton for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bald Hills
62.4/100
Brighton
75.0/100
Crime rate
Bald Hills
34.2 / 1k
Brighton
29.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bald Hills
60
Brighton
176
Population
Bald Hills
7,000
Brighton
9,664
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bald Hills | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.4/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 94.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.2 / 1k | 29.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 68 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 67.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 60 | 176 |
| Population | 7,000 | 9,664 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Bald Hills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Brighton is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Where Brighton is shaped by the coast, Bald Hills offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Bald Hills pulls ahead on excellent public transport and generous parks and open space, whereas Brighton is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Brighton, while Bald Hills remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.