Overall score
Bald Hills
61.9/100
Carseldine
67.7/100
Bald Hills for families and schools; Carseldine for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bald Hills
61.9/100
Carseldine
67.7/100
Crime rate
Bald Hills
33.6 / 1k
Carseldine
35.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bald Hills
60
Carseldine
178
Population
Bald Hills
7,000
Carseldine
10,093
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bald Hills | Carseldine |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.9/100 | 67.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.6 / 1k | 35.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 32 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 60 | 178 |
| Population | 7,000 | 10,093 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 9/10 |
Bald Hills reads as a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood; Carseldine is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Bald Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Carseldine keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bald Hills tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Carseldine stands out for parks and reserves and walkability.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Bald Hills the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Carseldine.