Overall score
Bald Hills
61.9/100
Fitzgibbon
58.4/100
Bald Hills for schools; Fitzgibbon for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bald Hills
61.9/100
Fitzgibbon
58.4/100
Crime rate
Bald Hills
33.6 / 1k
Fitzgibbon
24.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bald Hills
60
Fitzgibbon
141
Population
Bald Hills
7,000
Fitzgibbon
6,296
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bald Hills | Fitzgibbon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.9/100 | 58.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.6 / 1k | 24.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 17 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 60 | 141 |
| Population | 7,000 | 6,296 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Bald Hills reads as a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood; Fitzgibbon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Bald Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Fitzgibbon keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bald Hills tends to lead on schools and education options and public transport access, while Fitzgibbon stands out for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Bald Hills, while Fitzgibbon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.