Bangholme vs Keysborough, VIC Suburb Comparison

Bangholme for families and investment; Keysborough for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BangholmeKeysborough

Overall score

Bangholme

36.6/100

Keysborough

51.4/100

Crime rate

Bangholme

157.8 / 1k

Keysborough

57.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bangholme

5

Keysborough

288

Population

Bangholme

749

Keysborough

30,018

Metric leadBangholme 2Keysborough 101 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBangholmeKeysborough
Overall score36.6/10051.4/100
Housing (desirability)84.3/10043.0/100
Crime rate157.8 / 1k57.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves212
Public transport stops13118
Walkability19.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities5288
Planning activity28168
Green cover1.6%5.9%
Population74930,018
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Bangholme is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Keysborough is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Bangholme sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Keysborough is in a middle-ring position.

Bangholme tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Keysborough stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Bangholme generally means more approachable housing costs, while Keysborough leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Keysborough, while Bangholme remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons