Overall score
Keysborough
71.5/100
Lyndhurst
45.5/100
Keysborough for families and investment; Lyndhurst for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Keysborough
71.5/100
Lyndhurst
45.5/100
Crime rate
Keysborough
58.2 / 1k
Lyndhurst
50.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Keysborough
278
Lyndhurst
25
Population
Keysborough
30,018
Lyndhurst
8,926
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Keysborough | Lyndhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 71.5/100 | 45.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.2/100 | 54.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.2 / 1k | 50.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 118 | 36 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 278 | 25 |
| Planning activity | 168 | 11 |
| Population | 30,018 | 8,926 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 9/10 |
Keysborough is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks, while Lyndhurst is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Keysborough sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Lyndhurst is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Keysborough is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Lyndhurst answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Families and investors may find Keysborough the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Lyndhurst.