Overall score
Dandenong
68.2/100
Lyndhurst
45.5/100
Dandenong for families and investment; Lyndhurst for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Dandenong
68.2/100
Lyndhurst
45.5/100
Crime rate
Dandenong
323.5 / 1k
Lyndhurst
50.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dandenong
865
Lyndhurst
25
Population
Dandenong
30,127
Lyndhurst
8,926
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dandenong | Lyndhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 68.2/100 | 45.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.3/100 | 54.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 323.5 / 1k | 50.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 211 | 36 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 865 | 25 |
| Planning activity | 296 | 11 |
| Population | 30,127 | 8,926 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 9/10 |
Dandenong is a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Lyndhurst is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Dandenong sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Lyndhurst is further out with more breathing room.
Dandenong tends to lead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, while Lyndhurst stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Dandenong generally means more approachable housing costs, while Lyndhurst leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Dandenong if you are weighing families and investors; lean toward Lyndhurst for retirees.