Overall score
Bangholme
41.7/100
Lyndhurst
45.5/100
Bangholme for families and investment; Lyndhurst for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bangholme
41.7/100
Lyndhurst
45.5/100
Crime rate
Bangholme
144.5 / 1k
Lyndhurst
50.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bangholme
1
Lyndhurst
25
Population
Bangholme
749
Lyndhurst
8,926
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bangholme | Lyndhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.7/100 | 45.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 54.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 144.5 / 1k | 50.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 36 |
| Walkability | 19.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 25 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 11 |
| Population | 749 | 8,926 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 9/10 |
Bangholme reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Lyndhurst is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Bangholme pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Lyndhurst is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access. Bangholme generally means more approachable housing costs, while Lyndhurst leans toward more sought-after housing.
Bangholme suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Lyndhurst is the stronger match for retirees.