Banjup vs Hammond Park, WA Suburb Comparison

Hammond Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BanjupHammond Park

Overall score

Banjup

26.0/100

Hammond Park

46.1/100

Crime rate

Banjup

53.7 / 1k

Hammond Park

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Banjup

5

Hammond Park

149

Population

Banjup

1,377

Hammond Park

6,985

Metric leadBanjup 0Hammond Park 83 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBanjupHammond Park
Overall score26.0/10046.1/100
Housing (desirability)31.6/10053.2/100
Crime rate53.7 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools—5
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves25
Public transport stops622
Walkability9.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities5149
Green cover0.0%5.1%
Population1,3776,985
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Banjup reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Hammond Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Banjup sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Hammond Park is in a middle-ring position.

Banjup tends to lead on an affluent, sought-after address and an emerging neighbourhood, while Hammond Park stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hammond Park, while Banjup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons