Banjup vs Hammond Park, WA suburb comparison

Hammond Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BanjupHammond Park

Overall score

Banjup

22.8/100

Hammond Park

53.7/100

Crime rate

Banjup

7881.3 / 1k

Hammond Park

1477.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Banjup

2

Hammond Park

71

Population

Banjup

1,377

Hammond Park

6,985

Metric leadBanjup 0Hammond Park 81 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBanjupHammond Park
Overall score22.8/10053.7/100
Housing (desirability)32.4/10076.0/100
Crime rate7881.3 / 1k1477.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves25
Public transport stops622
Walkability9.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities271
Population1,3776,985
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Banjup reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Hammond Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Banjup sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Hammond Park is in a middle-ring position.

Banjup tends to lead on an affluent, sought-after address and improving crime trends, while Hammond Park stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hammond Park, while Banjup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons