Banjup vs Treeby, WA Suburb Comparison

Treeby for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BanjupTreeby

Overall score

Banjup

26.0/100

Treeby

44.2/100

Crime rate

Banjup

53.7 / 1k

Treeby

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Banjup

5

Treeby

73

Population

Banjup

1,377

Treeby

4,214

Metric leadBanjup 0Treeby 92 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBanjupTreeby
Overall score26.0/10044.2/100
Housing (desirability)31.6/10047.1/100
Crime rate53.7 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves215
Public transport stops613
Walkability9.0/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities573
Green cover0.0%29.4%
Population1,3774,214
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Banjup is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Treeby is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Banjup sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Treeby is in a middle-ring position.

Banjup pulls ahead on an affluent, sought-after address and an emerging neighbourhood, whereas Treeby is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Treeby, while Banjup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons