Barton vs Griffith, ACT suburb comparison

Barton for retirees and families; Griffith for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BartonGriffith

Overall score

Barton

55.2/100

Griffith

67.1/100

Crime rate

Barton

13.3 / 1k

Griffith

26.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Barton

271

Griffith

214

Population

Barton

1,946

Griffith

5,328

Metric leadBarton 5Griffith 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBartonGriffith
Overall score55.2/10067.1/100
Housing (desirability)35.7/10018.0/100
Crime rate13.3 / 1k26.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools410
Parks & reserves42
Walkability54.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities271214
Planning activity111
Population1,9465,328
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Barton is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Griffith is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Barton tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Griffith stands out for schools and education options and walkability.

Barton suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Griffith is the stronger match for investors.

Related comparisons