Griffith vs Kingston, ACT suburb comparison

Griffith for investment and value; Kingston for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GriffithKingston

Overall score

Griffith

67.1/100

Kingston

63.7/100

Crime rate

Griffith

26.2 / 1k

Kingston

18.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Griffith

214

Kingston

664

Population

Griffith

5,328

Kingston

6,579

Metric leadGriffith 3Kingston 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGriffithKingston
Overall score67.1/10063.7/100
Housing (desirability)18.0/10012.0/100
Crime rate26.2 / 1k18.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools105
Parks & reserves23
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities214664
Planning activity111
Population5,3286,579
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Griffith is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Kingston is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Griffith pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Kingston is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Griffith the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingston.

Related comparisons