Garran vs Griffith, ACT suburb comparison

Garran for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GarranGriffith

Overall score

Garran

61.9/100

Griffith

67.1/100

Crime rate

Garran

23.2 / 1k

Griffith

26.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Garran

231

Griffith

214

Population

Garran

3,706

Griffith

5,328

Metric leadGarran 3Griffith 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGarranGriffith
Overall score61.9/10067.1/100
Housing (desirability)41.2/10018.0/100
Crime rate23.2 / 1k26.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools710
Parks & reserves12
Walkability80.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities231214
Planning activity1211
Population3,7065,328
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Garran reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Griffith is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Garran is stronger for housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities; Griffith answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

Choose Garran if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Griffith for retirees and families.

Related comparisons