Garran vs Hughes, ACT suburb comparison

Hughes for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GarranHughes

Overall score

Garran

61.9/100

Hughes

63.5/100

Crime rate

Garran

23.2 / 1k

Hughes

8.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Garran

231

Hughes

65

Population

Garran

3,706

Hughes

3,210

Metric leadGarran 4Hughes 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGarranHughes
Overall score61.9/10063.5/100
Housing (desirability)41.2/10035.7/100
Crime rate23.2 / 1k8.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools710
Parks & reserves11
Walkability80.0/10066.5/100
Nearby amenities23165
Planning activity124
Population3,7063,210
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Garran is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Hughes is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Garran tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while Hughes stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hughes, while Garran remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons