Forrest vs Hughes, ACT suburb comparison

Hughes for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForrestHughes

Overall score

Forrest

52.7/100

Hughes

63.5/100

Crime rate

Forrest

11.7 / 1k

Hughes

8.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forrest

115

Hughes

65

Population

Forrest

1,827

Hughes

3,210

Metric leadForrest 1Hughes 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForrestHughes
Overall score52.7/10063.5/100
Housing (desirability)3.2/10035.7/100
Crime rate11.7 / 1k8.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools510
Parks & reserves11
Walkability21.0/10066.5/100
Nearby amenities11565
Planning activity64
Population1,8273,210
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Forrest is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Hughes is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Forrest pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Hughes is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hughes, while Forrest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons