Forrest vs Kingston, ACT suburb comparison

Forrest for retirees; Kingston for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForrestKingston

Overall score

Forrest

52.7/100

Kingston

63.7/100

Crime rate

Forrest

11.7 / 1k

Kingston

18.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forrest

115

Kingston

664

Population

Forrest

1,827

Kingston

6,579

Metric leadForrest 1Kingston 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForrestKingston
Overall score52.7/10063.7/100
Housing (desirability)3.2/10012.0/100
Crime rate11.7 / 1k18.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Parks & reserves13
Walkability21.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities115664
Planning activity61
Population1,8276,579
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Forrest reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Kingston is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Forrest pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, whereas Kingston is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Kingston, while Forrest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons