Overall score
Forrest
52.7/100
Yarralumla
59.7/100
Forrest for retirees; Yarralumla for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forrest
52.7/100
Yarralumla
59.7/100
Crime rate
Forrest
11.7 / 1k
Yarralumla
14.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forrest
115
Yarralumla
424
Population
Forrest
1,827
Yarralumla
3,120
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forrest | Yarralumla |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.7/100 | 59.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 3.2/100 | 14.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.7 / 1k | 14.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 6 |
| Walkability | 21.0/100 | 79.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 115 | 424 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 7 |
| Population | 1,827 | 3,120 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Forrest is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Yarralumla is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Forrest is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Yarralumla answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Yarralumla, while Forrest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.