Forrest vs Garran, ACT suburb comparison

Forrest for retirees; Garran for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForrestGarran

Overall score

Forrest

52.7/100

Garran

61.9/100

Crime rate

Forrest

11.7 / 1k

Garran

23.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forrest

115

Garran

231

Population

Forrest

1,827

Garran

3,706

Metric leadForrest 2Garran 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForrestGarran
Overall score52.7/10061.9/100
Housing (desirability)3.2/10041.2/100
Crime rate11.7 / 1k23.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Parks & reserves11
Walkability21.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities115231
Planning activity612
Population1,8273,706
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Forrest reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Garran is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Forrest pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Garran is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options.

Forrest suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Garran is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons