Baskerville vs Gidgegannup, WA suburb comparison

Baskerville for retirees and families; Gidgegannup for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BaskervilleGidgegannup

Overall score

Baskerville

35.1/100

Gidgegannup

44.5/100

Crime rate

Baskerville

31373.1 / 1k

Gidgegannup

3255.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Baskerville

8

Gidgegannup

0

Population

Baskerville

302

Gidgegannup

2,818

Metric leadBaskerville 2Gidgegannup 41 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBaskervilleGidgegannup
Overall score35.1/10044.5/100
Housing (desirability)35.7/10041.0/100
Crime rate31373.1 / 1k3255.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops10
Walkability17.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities80
Population3022,818
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Baskerville reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Gidgegannup is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Gidgegannup sits among greener hillside streets, while Baskerville keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Baskerville tends to lead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Gidgegannup stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Retirees and families may find Baskerville the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Gidgegannup.

Related comparisons