Overall score
Baskerville
35.1/100
Gidgegannup
44.5/100
Baskerville for retirees and families; Gidgegannup for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Baskerville
35.1/100
Gidgegannup
44.5/100
Crime rate
Baskerville
31373.1 / 1k
Gidgegannup
3255.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Baskerville
8
Gidgegannup
0
Population
Baskerville
302
Gidgegannup
2,818
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Baskerville | Gidgegannup |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 44.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.7/100 | 41.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 31373.1 / 1k | 3255.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | — |
| Walkability | 17.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 0 |
| Population | 302 | 2,818 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Baskerville reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Gidgegannup is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Gidgegannup sits among greener hillside streets, while Baskerville keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Baskerville tends to lead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Gidgegannup stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Retirees and families may find Baskerville the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Gidgegannup.