Baskerville vs Gidgegannup, WA Suburb Comparison

Baskerville for families; Gidgegannup for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BaskervilleGidgegannup

Overall score

Baskerville

39.6/100

Gidgegannup

41.1/100

Crime rate

Baskerville

43.1 / 1k

Gidgegannup

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Baskerville

21

Gidgegannup

5

Population

Baskerville

302

Gidgegannup

2,818

Metric leadBaskerville 3Gidgegannup 33 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBaskervilleGidgegannup
Overall score39.6/10041.1/100
Housing (desirability)47.4/10035.6/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Public transport stops10—
Walkability15.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities215
Green cover1.1%40.6%
Population3022,818
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Baskerville reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Gidgegannup is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Gidgegannup sits among greener hillside streets, while Baskerville keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Baskerville tends to lead on walkability, plus nearby cafés and amenities, while Gidgegannup stands out for housing affordability, overall desirability, and a larger local community.

Retirees and families may find Baskerville the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gidgegannup.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons