Overall score
Gidgegannup
44.5/100
Upper Swan
41.9/100
Gidgegannup for retirees; Upper Swan for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gidgegannup
44.5/100
Upper Swan
41.9/100
Crime rate
Gidgegannup
3255.9 / 1k
Upper Swan
17257.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gidgegannup
0
Upper Swan
4
Population
Gidgegannup
2,818
Upper Swan
549
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gidgegannup | Upper Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.5/100 | 41.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.0/100 | 43.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 3255.9 / 1k | 17257.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 22 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 4 |
| Population | 2,818 | 549 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Gidgegannup is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Upper Swan is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Gidgegannup sits among greener hillside streets, while Upper Swan keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Gidgegannup tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a larger local community, while Upper Swan stands out for housing affordability and walkability.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Upper Swan, while Gidgegannup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.