Overall score
Baulkham Hills
69.5/100
Norwest
61.9/100
Baulkham Hills for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Baulkham Hills
69.5/100
Norwest
61.9/100
Crime rate
Baulkham Hills
22.1 / 1k
Norwest
22.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Baulkham Hills
285
Norwest
395
Population
Baulkham Hills
37,415
Norwest
4,688
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Baulkham Hills | Norwest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.5/100 | 61.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.3/100 | 16.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.1 / 1k | 22.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 460 | 84 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 83.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 285 | 395 |
| Planning activity | 64 | 22 |
| Population | 37,415 | 4,688 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Baulkham Hills reads as a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Norwest is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Baulkham Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Norwest keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Baulkham Hills is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Norwest answers with nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Baulkham Hills, while Norwest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.