Overall score
Baulkham Hills
69.5/100
Bella Vista
61.3/100
Baulkham Hills for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Baulkham Hills
69.5/100
Bella Vista
61.3/100
Crime rate
Baulkham Hills
22.1 / 1k
Bella Vista
22.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Baulkham Hills
285
Bella Vista
234
Population
Baulkham Hills
37,415
Bella Vista
8,384
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Baulkham Hills | Bella Vista |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.5/100 | 61.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.3/100 | 26.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.1 / 1k | 22.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 460 | 120 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 285 | 234 |
| Planning activity | 66 | 17 |
| Population | 37,415 | 8,384 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Baulkham Hills is a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Bella Vista is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Baulkham Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Bella Vista keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Baulkham Hills is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Bella Vista answers with walkability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Baulkham Hills, while Bella Vista remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.