Beacon Hill vs Frenchs Forest, NSW suburb comparison

Beacon Hill for retirees and families; Frenchs Forest for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beacon HillFrenchs Forest

Overall score

Beacon Hill

62.7/100

Frenchs Forest

69.6/100

Crime rate

Beacon Hill

46.9 / 1k

Frenchs Forest

19.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beacon Hill

243

Frenchs Forest

458

Population

Beacon Hill

7,814

Frenchs Forest

14,267

Metric leadBeacon Hill 1Frenchs Forest 91 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeacon HillFrenchs Forest
Overall score62.7/10069.6/100
Housing (desirability)37.2/10041.2/100
Crime rate46.9 / 1k19.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools910
Parks & reserves1128
Public transport stops76193
Walkability34.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities243458
Planning activity1539
Population7,81414,267
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beacon Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Frenchs Forest is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Beacon Hill pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Frenchs Forest is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Beacon Hill if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Frenchs Forest for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons