Overall score
Belrose
58.7/100
Frenchs Forest
69.6/100
Frenchs Forest for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belrose
58.7/100
Frenchs Forest
69.6/100
Crime rate
Belrose
20.2 / 1k
Frenchs Forest
19.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belrose
159
Frenchs Forest
458
Population
Belrose
8,726
Frenchs Forest
14,267
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belrose | Frenchs Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.7/100 | 69.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.2/100 | 41.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 20.2 / 1k | 19.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 16 | 28 |
| Public transport stops | 127 | 193 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 159 | 458 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 38 |
| Population | 8,726 | 14,267 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Belrose reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Frenchs Forest is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Belrose is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Frenchs Forest answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Frenchs Forest, while Belrose remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.