Overall score
Belrose
60.8/100
Frenchs Forest
69.7/100
Belrose vs Frenchs Forest, NSW Suburb Comparison
Frenchs Forest for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BelroseFrenchs Forest
Crime rate
Belrose
20.2 / 1k
Frenchs Forest
19.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belrose
163
Frenchs Forest
465
Population
Belrose
8,726
Frenchs Forest
14,267
Metric leadBelrose 2Frenchs Forest 92 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesFrenchs Forest
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belrose | Frenchs Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.8/100 | 69.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.5/100 | 43.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 20.2 / 1k | 19.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 16 | 28 |
| Public transport stops | 127 | 193 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 163 | 465 |
| Planning activity | 26 | 50 |
| Green cover | 2.8% | 11.4% |
| Population | 8,726 | 14,267 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Belrose reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Frenchs Forest is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Belrose is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Frenchs Forest answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Frenchs Forest, while Belrose remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.