Frenchs Forest vs Killarney Heights, NSW Suburb Comparison

Frenchs Forest for retirees and value; Killarney Heights for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Frenchs ForestKillarney Heights

Overall score

Frenchs Forest

69.7/100

Killarney Heights

58.3/100

Crime rate

Frenchs Forest

19.5 / 1k

Killarney Heights

15.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Frenchs Forest

465

Killarney Heights

104

Population

Frenchs Forest

14,267

Killarney Heights

4,502

Metric leadFrenchs Forest 8Killarney Heights 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFrenchs ForestKillarney Heights
Overall score69.7/10058.3/100
Housing (desirability)43.3/10044.2/100
Crime rate19.5 / 1k15.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools106
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves288
Public transport stops19331
Walkability100.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities465104
Planning activity5015
Green cover11.4%0.8%
Population14,2674,502
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Frenchs Forest reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Killarney Heights is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Killarney Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Frenchs Forest keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Frenchs Forest pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Killarney Heights is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Frenchs Forest the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Killarney Heights.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons