Overall score
Beaconsfield
47.6/100
Redfern
69.7/100
Beaconsfield vs Redfern, NSW suburb comparison
Redfern for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BeaconsfieldRedfern
Crime rate
Beaconsfield
88.3 / 1k
Redfern
235.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beaconsfield
48
Redfern
465
Population
Beaconsfield
1,172
Redfern
13,072
Metric leadBeaconsfield 3Redfern 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beaconsfield | Redfern |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.6/100 | 69.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 11.9/100 | 10.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 88.3 / 1k | 235.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 22 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 73 |
| Walkability | 42.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 48 | 465 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 50 |
| Population | 1,172 | 13,072 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Beaconsfield is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Redfern is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Beaconsfield is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Redfern answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Redfern, while Beaconsfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.