Beaconsfield vs Chippendale, NSW suburb comparison

Beaconsfield for retirees and investment; Chippendale for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeaconsfieldChippendale

Overall score

Beaconsfield

47.6/100

Chippendale

58.2/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield

88.3 / 1k

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield

48

Chippendale

533

Population

Beaconsfield

1,172

Chippendale

7,803

Metric leadBeaconsfield 2Chippendale 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfieldChippendale
Overall score47.6/10058.2/100
Housing (desirability)11.9/1004.4/100
Crime rate88.3 / 1k73.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1329
Parks & reserves35
Public transport stops612
Walkability42.0/10088.0/100
Nearby amenities48533
Planning activity916
Population1,1727,803
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Beaconsfield reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Beaconsfield is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Chippendale answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Retirees and investors may find Beaconsfield the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chippendale.

Related comparisons