Beaconsfield vs Fremantle, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beaconsfield | Fremantle |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.6/100 | 68.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 20.4/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Schools & preschools | — | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 80 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 200 | 930 |
| Population | 5,315 | 9,251 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBeaconsfield
- Best for familiesBeaconsfield
- Best for beach lifestyleFremantle
- Best for investmentFremantle
- Best for best valueFremantle
- Best for best schoolsFremantle
Comparison summary
Beaconsfield (WA) and Fremantle offer different strengths across official suburb data. Fremantle leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Fremantle; Housing (desirability) favours Fremantle; Parks & reserves favours Fremantle. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Beaconsfield (WA), Families → Beaconsfield (WA), Beach lifestyle → Fremantle, Investment → Fremantle.