Overall score
Beaconsfield
57.0/100
Fremantle
71.4/100
Beaconsfield for retirees and families; Fremantle for beach lifestyle and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beaconsfield
57.0/100
Fremantle
71.4/100
Crime rate
Beaconsfield
2118.5 / 1k
Fremantle
1169.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beaconsfield
200
Fremantle
930
Population
Beaconsfield
5,315
Fremantle
9,251
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beaconsfield | Fremantle |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.0/100 | 71.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 20.4/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 2118.5 / 1k | 1169.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 80 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 200 | 930 |
| Population | 5,315 | 9,251 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Beaconsfield reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Fremantle is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Where Fremantle is shaped by the coast, Beaconsfield offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Beaconsfield tends to lead on excellent public transport and an affluent, sought-after address, while Fremantle stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Beaconsfield suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Fremantle is the stronger match for people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors.