Beaconsfield vs Fremantle, WA suburb comparison

Beaconsfield for retirees and families; Fremantle for beach lifestyle and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeaconsfieldFremantle

Overall score

Beaconsfield

57.0/100

Fremantle

71.4/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield

2118.5 / 1k

Fremantle

1169.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield

200

Fremantle

930

Population

Beaconsfield

5,315

Fremantle

9,251

Metric leadBeaconsfield 1Fremantle 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfieldFremantle
Overall score57.0/10071.4/100
Housing (desirability)20.4/10051.0/100
Crime rate2118.5 / 1k1169.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools119
Parks & reserves611
Public transport stops3380
Walkability86.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities200930
Population5,3159,251
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Beaconsfield reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Fremantle is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Where Fremantle is shaped by the coast, Beaconsfield offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Beaconsfield tends to lead on excellent public transport and an affluent, sought-after address, while Fremantle stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Beaconsfield suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Fremantle is the stronger match for people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors.

Related comparisons