Beaconsfield vs O'Connor, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beaconsfield | O'Connor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.6/100 | 41.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 20.4/100 | 4.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | — |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 23 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 200 | 96 |
| Population | 5,315 | 460 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBeaconsfield
- Best for familiesBeaconsfield
- Best for investmentBeaconsfield
- Best for best valueBeaconsfield
- Best for best schoolsBeaconsfield
Comparison summary
Beaconsfield (WA) and O'Connor (WA) offer different strengths across official suburb data. Beaconsfield (WA) leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Beaconsfield (WA); Housing (desirability) favours Beaconsfield (WA); Public transport stops favours Beaconsfield (WA). Quick verdicts: Retirees → Beaconsfield (WA), Families → Beaconsfield (WA), Investment → Beaconsfield (WA), Best value → Beaconsfield (WA).