O'Connor vs White Gum Valley, WA suburb comparison

White Gum Valley for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

O'ConnorWhite Gum Valley

Overall score

O'Connor

45.3/100

White Gum Valley

44.7/100

Crime rate

O'Connor

178500.0 / 1k

White Gum Valley

3182.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

O'Connor

96

White Gum Valley

95

Population

O'Connor

460

White Gum Valley

3,358

Metric leadO'Connor 4White Gum Valley 5across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryO'ConnorWhite Gum Valley
Overall score45.3/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)4.2/10028.4/100
Crime rate178500.0 / 1k3182.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools910
Parks & reserves3
Public transport stops2319
Walkability57.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities9695
Population4603,358
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, O'Connor is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and White Gum Valley is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

O'Connor tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while White Gum Valley stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer White Gum Valley, while O'Connor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons