O'Connor vs South Fremantle, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | O'Connor | South Fremantle |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.0/100 | 69.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 4.2/100 | 67.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 17 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 95.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 96 | 227 |
| Population | 460 | 3,398 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesSouth Fremantle
- Best for familiesSouth Fremantle
- Best for beach lifestyleSouth Fremantle
- Best for investmentSouth Fremantle
- Best for best valueSouth Fremantle
Comparison summary
O'Connor (WA) and South Fremantle offer different strengths across official suburb data. South Fremantle leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours South Fremantle; Housing (desirability) favours South Fremantle; Public transport stops favours O'Connor (WA). Quick verdicts: Retirees → South Fremantle, Families → South Fremantle, Beach lifestyle → South Fremantle, Investment → South Fremantle.