Overall score
O'Connor
45.3/100
South Fremantle
68.8/100
South Fremantle for retirees and beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
O'Connor
45.3/100
South Fremantle
68.8/100
Crime rate
O'Connor
178500.0 / 1k
South Fremantle
3365.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
O'Connor
96
South Fremantle
227
Population
O'Connor
460
South Fremantle
3,398
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | O'Connor | South Fremantle |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.3/100 | 68.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 4.2/100 | 67.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 178500.0 / 1k | 3365.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 17 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 95.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 96 | 227 |
| Population | 460 | 3,398 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
O'Connor reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; South Fremantle is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where South Fremantle is shaped by the coast, O'Connor offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
O'Connor pulls ahead on public transport access, whereas South Fremantle is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer South Fremantle, while O'Connor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.