O'Connor vs South Fremantle, WA suburb comparison

South Fremantle for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

O'ConnorSouth Fremantle

Overall score

O'Connor

45.3/100

South Fremantle

68.8/100

Crime rate

O'Connor

178500.0 / 1k

South Fremantle

3365.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

O'Connor

96

South Fremantle

227

Population

O'Connor

460

South Fremantle

3,398

Metric leadO'Connor 2South Fremantle 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryO'ConnorSouth Fremantle
Overall score45.3/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)4.2/10067.2/100
Crime rate178500.0 / 1k3365.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools96
Parks & reserves7
Public transport stops2317
Walkability57.0/10095.5/100
Nearby amenities96227
Population4603,398
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

O'Connor reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; South Fremantle is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where South Fremantle is shaped by the coast, O'Connor offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

O'Connor pulls ahead on public transport access, whereas South Fremantle is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer South Fremantle, while O'Connor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons